Ancestry Sync - what
gives?
I belong to several Facebook genealogy groups. I am here to
talk about the Family Tree Maker user group and the Roots Magic user group.
Even though both software vendors have promised to offer a “New” Ancestry sync,
neither have been able to deliver on the promise, YET.
Lucky for all the loyal FTM users, in Feb of 2016 MacKiev
stepped forward and acquired the software line since it was already the
publisher for the Mac versions. Ancestry
also announced that they have an agreement with Roots Magic to allow them to
connect to Ancestry Trees in a similar fashion as FTM. Both promised to have
the “NEW” Ancestry sync logic working by the end of 2016.
So as we got near to the end of 2016, I heard many more
rumblings and complaints on the FTM user group page than the RM user group
page. I wondered why.
My theory (and only a theory), FTM users are going to lose a
feature while RM users are going to gain a feature. Let’s look at this for a
moment. People, who are going to lose something, already know how valuable the
feature is, how much easier it makes their life and research and they have
every right to be upset, while people who haven’t experienced the feature where
things aren’t going to change for them come the end of 2016.
What some (maybe a lot) of users of FTM seem to forget is
that we now have three separate companies trying to bring you a feature. As a
former programmer, I am sure FTM and RM set up a “Mirror” site to test their
program. My question, who was testing the program? Was it programmers who don’t
understand how the user’s use the program or was it actual users. This makes a
big difference. Also, unless Ancestry was in on the “Mirror” testing site,
MacKiev could not setup the testing features under normal conditions. It wasn’t
until Ancestry finally turns off the old sync logic and then turns on the new
sync logic that MacKiev could actually test all the features of the sync. Data
in each user’s tree is very unique, some have extremely large tress, I have
heard about 100,000 plus people in their trees. Some also have very large media
trees but perhaps not as many people while others have some sort of combination.
Plus where was the problem, in FTM/RM code or on Ancestry side? Being able to
duplicate a user’s error is the key in finding out the situation. Was it a
one-time fluke or a recurring error? Having user’s test the system and being
able to explain the steps they took that resulted in the error is the key. As a
person on both sides of the fence this is difficult to do.
Therefore, I am not going to tell users of FTM or RM for
that manner, to relax and breathe. I understand being impatient, frustrated,
angry, all the emotions associated with this update/change that is occurring.
What I want to say is venting on the FTM user group site doesn’t solve
anything. I always say, if you are not part of the solution, you are only part
of the problem. Instead of venting, sign up to be a beta tester. When you test,
take your time and record the steps you are doing during your testing. If you
are not selected as a tester, please don’t take it personally, they have limits
on the number of testers they can handle and address the issues. It helps the
programmers to find the most reliable, experience users they can find to become
beta testers. Is their process on picking the testers infallible? NO, let’s be
honest the questions they ask are quite broad, and those who never been a beta
tester might not even realize all the work that is involved to become a beta
tester.
So I want to thank all the people who agreed to become a
beta tester and went through with their promise. It is not easy being a tester.
You might end up screwing up your on-line tree, break links that already exist
just to name a few problems. You might have to resort to going back to your
backup files to continue your research on your previous versions.
I also want to thank all people behind the scenes at FTM, RM
and Ancestry. I am sure you worked many long hours, some probably without
overtime pay, because you want to make us the users happy in the end by
delivering as solid of a package as you can.
This situation is very unique, since FTM and RM are moving
from a stand-alone software program to an integrated program that works with a
third party, Ancestry. When a company relies on the help and cooperation with
another company, things take a while. Each company has a liaison who works with
the other liaison who works with the behind the scenes people. Each company has to bring together their staff
and brainstorm on the next course of action. This unfortunately will add to the
time table.
I am done with my venting of venters and hope that FTM and
RM software is up and running soon. I compare this to our last presidential election,
I can’t wait until this is all over with and we can get back to helping people
use their software to the fullest on the Facebook user group pages.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment, however all comments must be approved before posting. Thank you for your understanding.